FDTD/Example
From ScientificComputing
For the example simulation, we are using the nanowire.fsp input file, which is provided by lumerical solutions.
[leonhard@euler01 ~]$ ls -ltr nanowire.fsp -rw-r----- 1 leonhard T0000 202664975 Jun 10 2015 nanowire.fsp [leonhard@euler01 ~]$ module load open_mpi/1.6.5 fdtd/8.11 matlab/8.2 [leonhard@euler01 ~]$ lsfsubmit.sh -n 4 -w 1:00 -mem 250 -inp nanowire.fsp Job, requesting 4 CPU's submitted at Tue Oct 11 12:56:22 CEST 2016 FDTD job. Job <30077428> is submitted to queue <normal.4h>. [leonhard@euler01 ~]$ bjobs JOBID USER STAT QUEUE FROM_HOST EXEC_HOST JOB_NAME SUBMIT_TIME 30077428 leonhard PEND normal.4h euler01 *owire.fsp Oct 11 12:56 [leonhard@euler01 ~]$ bjobs JOBID USER STAT QUEUE FROM_HOST EXEC_HOST JOB_NAME SUBMIT_TIME 30077428 leonhard RUN normal.4h euler01 4*e1041 *owire.fsp Oct 11 12:56 [leonhard@euler01 ~]$ bjobs No unfinished job found [leonhard@euler01 ~]$ grep -A5 Overall nanowire_p0.log Overall wall time measurements in seconds: time to mesh and initialize: 0 time to run FDTD simulation: 2 time to finalize data and save to files: 2 FDTD solver speed: 51.1248 Mnodes/s total FDTD solver speed on 4 processes: 204.499 Mnodes/s [leonhard@euler01 ~]$
The lsf.o* log file contains information about the resource usage and the overall progress of the job, whereas nanowire_p0.log contains more detailed information about the simulation.